Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Random Thoughts on Each 2014 Opponent


             Random Thoughts on Each 2014 Opponent



Welp, it's April...a little over four months away until the 2014 college football season is underway. And though it may seem like a long way off, it's never too soon nor early to start pondering on the upcoming season, especially on each upcoming opponet. So for this addition of the 'RamblinArkansan', I thought it'd be fun to discuss something quirky/interesting/fun about each of the Red Wolves upcoming 2014 opponents. So without further adieu....



Game #1: Montana State Bobcats

This comes from a Montana State alumni by the name of Cole Creichenberg, a digital editor for country radio station in Montana. Apparently Mr. Creichenberg wasn't pleased by his Universities decision to spend $18,000 dollars for an out of state marketing firm to upgrade MSU's logos...or more specifically, lack of upgrade. Quite honestly, I feel he definitely has an argument-They slightly changed fonts, added color and added slight details to the eyes and ears and that costs $18,000?? You can read Creichenberg's full blog here



Game #2: Tennessee Volunteers
The latest trend it seems is whenever ASU schedules fledgling/struggling SEC programs, not only do they dominate the Red Wolves but often end up having a ridiculous season (Auburn...Missouri...). Can the same be true for the Volunteers? Only time will tell, but their recruiting class they recently raked in certainly seems very, very impressive. While we contemplate, watch this Vols fan reaction to Alabama blocking Tennessee's potential game winning field goal (NSFW by the way lol...)



Game #3: Miami Hurricanes

The U!!!! Definitely could not believe we have a home and home series with Miami (granted, the return game in Jonesboro isn't taking place for another 3 years but still!). Though we'll probably lose this game, I'm still oober excited for this. Whenever Miami and Sunbelt football get brought up, then you HAVE to watch this video of the Miami/FIU brawl from 2006 lol.



Game #4: Utah State Aggies

To me, this is a BIG, CRUCIAL game for the Red Wolves. Astate and the Utah State are very similar programs in terms of where both programs have been and where they're both currently trending towards. The Aggies have become a respectable program and were one win away from being Mountain West Conference championships. To me, this game is a measuring stick of if ASU can keep up the momentum they've built the last three seasons and this win would go a long way for the continued success of the football program. Speaking of coming a long way, check out the Aggies logo history! 





Game #5: UL-Monroe Warhakws

Ohhh the chicken hawks...What can I say? You're the little program that keeps on chuggin' along. The way I always look at this annual match-up is when we win, good! sweet...we're suppose to bear ULM. When we lose, i'm aggravated... like losing to your little sibling in a game of horse aggravated. Here's hoping we continue our winning streak again the Warhawks (have won the last four against them!). I will say this: Did you know ULM has a water ski team and they've won 20 national championships? Take a look!



Game #6: Georgia State Panthers

The new FIU to the Sunbelt, I have a feeling the GSU program were super stoked to be division I and invited to the belt upon initially reaction...and then super bummed when they found out Georgia Southern was coming along. 

Hey! Here's a picture of rapper Ludacris repin' a Georgia State! Cute!


Game #7: UL-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns

I refuse to call them "Louisiana" and until they get a state mandated confirmation they can change their name to "Louisiana" they'll forever be known as LALA. It's absolutely insane how stubborn cajun fans strive to have themselves refer as Louisiana; it's as if by having the state moniker instead of their actual university name it'll make them "super legit." They finally beat us the past season after winning two straight, and had to share the conference title, which to me I don't actually mind as this really adds on to the hatred both programs have for one another (players, staff and fan wise). 

SPEAKING OF LA LA FANS!!! ....



haha couldn't help myself. The Cajuns are beginning renovations for their stadium and judging from artist renditions, I will admit it looks great!


Game #8: Idaho Vandals

The last time ASU played in the Kibbie Dome, quite a lot was going down in the year 2004. Crazy to think the Pistons were A)good and B)beat the Lakers 4-1 for the NBA Title among other things. Both teams were conference foes and now will once again will be, albeit Arkansas State has changed dramatically, both name wise and overall competitiveness. Idaho, on the other, has been down in the dumps. But hey, look on the bright side Vandals fans! You have two things going for you (From what my google search hast turned up):



These guys have a bright future in the WWE...


Need I say more?



Game #9: South Alabama Jaguars

First off, I have high props and nothing but mad respect for the USA program. They've got great leadership in the athletic department, huge money being thrown into their relatively young program and if they can ever get an on-campus stadium, the sky's the limits for the Jaguars. The first two games with South Al have been tremendous battles for the Red Wolves and I suspect the November 8th match-up will be yet another one.

If you've never seen their football complex and facilities, check it out!





Game #10: Appalachian State Mountaineers

A very interesting addition to the Sunbelt, I'm definitely looking forward to this match-up of the "ASU's". They had a bumpy season last year and I think they'll probably have another year of adjusting, but hey who can forget this?!



Game #11: Texas State Bobcats

 The Bobcats enter year two of the 'Belt, and I foresee San Marcos bunch to have a very solid year and no doubt give the Red Wolves a fight. Have you ever seen the Texas State Bobcats logo? No? Take a look see!


Pretty cool logo but don't think about slappin' it on a t-shirt. Texas State officials are very protective of their logo-just ask Texas Valley High School


Game #12: New Mexico State Aggies

Whew! A lot of 'State's' we know! NMSU, much like Idaho, are coming back to the Belt as conference members and it's been a while since ASU took a trip to Las Crus, New Mexico to take on the Aggies (2003!). But if you think this is going to be cakewalk for the Wolfpack you better think twice! These rabid Aggies fans are definitely going to give Aggie Memorial Stadium a scary home-field advantage!

OH! Speaking of New Mexico State and Brawls earlier...




Should be a very interesting 2014 season for the Red Wolves, and if we can quickly reload on both offensive and defensive lines and if Fredi Knighten can actually throw completions down field, I imagine it'll be yet another fantastic year for Arkansas State.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

The Current and Future of the SunBelt Football Conference

 



     When the football conference started in 2001, it was made primarily of universities recently hopping to Division I status and those already Division I, yet were the laughing stock of NCAA Football. Arkansas State, Middle Tennessee, Troy, UL-Monroe, UL-Lafayette, North Texas, New Mexico State and Idaho were the founding football members. Though the first few years many if not all struggled for prominence and success, the conference and it's members gradually over the course of it's 13 year existence have found a little recognition and some resemblance of accomplishments. Its also seen it's share of deserters and newcomers, beginning when Troy came along in 2004, then New Mexico State and Idaho left for the WAC Conference. Then Sunbelt brought in Florida International and Florida Atlantic, both of whom had only began a football programs 3-5 years previously, came along to compensate for the loss. Western Kentucky, who had been long time members in the Sunbelt in all sports except football, finally moved their FCS level program to Division I, joining the football ranks in 2009. The Sunbelt, it appeared would finally have some sense of stability, until the recent wave of realignment kicked in in 2011-12 in the collegiate ranks. It hit the Sunbelt when founding members North Texas and Middle Tennessee along with Florida Atlantic, Florida International and Western Kentucky all received invites and left when invited to join Conference USA (CUSA).

     Despite so much turnover, the conference has attempted to carry on with the remaining programs and to recoup their losses once again has dipped into the FCS Level, adding another football program upstart (Georgia State), and snatching Appalachian State and Georgia Southern, the top two programs in terms of success and national championships the last several seasons in the FCS. Recently, the commissioner of the Sunbelt, Karl Benson, has been quoted in many news outlets and sources that the SunBelt is "actively looking to add a 12th member by June 1st of this year." Benson has made it no secret he wants a 12th member in football in order to secure a conference championship game. Though he's not publicly announced which schools he and the other administration members are targeting, he recently told Jeremy Fowler of CBS Sports that "4-6 schools are vying to be the 12th member." Benson has also made it clear that one priority when considering the 12th member is someone to "stabilize the east" and "ensuring "Appalachian State a traveling partner." One final aspect Benson has been quoted as saying he's focusing on when deciding on which school to invite is someone that can become a FULL member-meaning they will join the conference in all sports, not just football.

     So with all this in mind, I decided for this addition of the "Ramblin' Arkansan Blogs" to focus on the popular internet rumors that have been speculated throughout the internet as well some I would personally think should be considered.

First off, here's a map showing the current members of the SunBelt Conference:



Before we continue, let me first say that 'No...I didn't place a random red dot on Idaho by mistake...' The University of Idaho AND New Mexico State are back in the Sunbelt, as football only members. Their had been some speculation and rumors that NMSU might have a full conference invitation, but according to the beat writer at The Advertiser in Lafayette, Louisiana, the Aggies are no longer in consideration for that. (And with the recent thug antics by the NMSU basketball team, who want's them??).  Now, as you can see by the graphic above, the Sunbelt is going to be an EXTREMELY stretched out conference. Why Benson is so adamant about getting App. State a travel partner in the East I have no idea (I thought this is why Georgia Southern received an invite seeing how both were former members together in the FCS conference, the Southern Conference). To me, the real focus should be getting Idaho, NMSU and Texas State a traveling mate that's sandwiched by all three, but I'll dive into my own thoughts and ideas later on this blog. For now, we'll go with what Karl wants, which is a team in the East.  Several University programs have been tossed around, two in particular which have publicly expressed desire to join the Sunbelt/Division I:

Liberty University Flames
In fact, Liberty has publicly spoken out about being very receptive to joining the Sunbelt conference and in fact almost did join the conference some years back, were ultimately rejected by the members of the Sunbelt Conference (FYI, in the 'Belt, a potential member must receive 75% or more Yes votes in order to be extended an invitation). By all my research and google searches, it appears Liberty has appropriate athletic budget in order to be a viable Division I member-they went 8-4 last year in the Big South Conference, were conference champions in 2007 and 2008, and are coached by former Buffalo Bulls and Kansas Jayhawks coach, Turner Gill. Located in Lynchburg, Virginia they appear to qualify for every factor that Benson has stated he's looking for in a 12th member. But perhapswhat hurts their chances is the fact of Liberty being a private, and (how they describe themselves), "largest evangelical christian" university in the world. Not saying their's anything wrong with this, but it doesn't match public university demographic all the current members have in the Sunbelt. On top of that, the University's enrollment is primarily made up of online students, with a little over 12,000 on campus students. (FUN FACT: The School was founded by famous televangelist Jerry Falwell, in 1971). It should be strongly be pointed out that the Flames seem to be Benson's top choice right now to become the 12th member, so until the announcement comes it has to be assumed Liberty is the leading candidate.




James Madison University Dukes

      The other leading candidate would be the JMU Dukes, of the Colonial Athletic Association. They shocked the college football world in 2010 when they went to Blacksburg, Virginia and knocked off the Hokies of Virginia Tech. They've longed mantained strong and steady success in football, having won the FCS National Championship in 2004, four conference titles and numerous appearances in the FCS playoffs. With nearly 20,000 students and also located in Virginia, they would seem to be the perfect 12th member in Karl's eyes: However, JMU officials have made it clear numerous times they were NOT interested in a Sunbelt invite; many rumors have circulated the Dukes are hoping for a C-USA invite, and recently it's been speculated the Mid-American Conference might invite them to become the conference's 14th member.  




The additional rumored candiates are:

 Eastern Kentucky Colonels
 Tenn. Chattanooga Mocs
Missouri State Bears













All three schools have one point in time either have done internal studies to decide whether Division I status was popular and/or expressed desires to move on up. It was recently revealed that Tennessee Chattanooga program was actually approached by the Sunbelt on the possibility of moving up, but declined stating the University wasn't quite ready to move up, but were open to the idea in the future. Seemingly, EKU and Missouri State don't appear fully ready nor committed in moving up to full Division I status, and seem at this time unlikely to become the 12th member, especially by the June 1st deadline. Finally, one foreboding problem for the Bears is geography-take a look below:



The "X" on the map above signifies where Missouri State is located. Judging from what we know as of now, the divisions are essentially going to be divided by the Mississippi river, with the Western teams on the left side and the Eastern Division on the right hand side. Benson has made it known he's focusing on a "Eastern team"-Missouri State is obviously on the wrong side. Of course the divisions could always be swapped around, though I imagine you would have a hard time breaking up the Louisiana, Alabama and Georgia Schools.

WHO I FEEL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED:

So, as I hinted at at the beginning of this blog, I don't really know why Karl is so insistent on getting an "EAST team". Yes Karl, I understand the closest member to App. State is Georgia State, which is approximately just under 5 hours away by bus for the Mountaineers. However, their longest divisional foe would be South Alabama, which is located almost 9 1/2 hours away in Mobile. That is no where near as bad as the Western division members travelling: Lets look at a comparison by using my beloved Red Wolves as an example:

CLOSET CONFERENCE FOE: ULM Warhwaks (Travel time by bus: 5 hours)
FARTHEST CONFERENCE FOE: Idaho (1 hour bus from jonesboro to memphis, 6-8 hours flight time to boise, then another 5 1/2 hours to Moscow).

They would to do this EVERY YEAR, ON TOP OF TRAVELING TO LAS CRUS, NEW MEXICO (which by the way is 1,127 miles away)/.

Again, referring to the maps displayed throughout this blog, the potential eastern division is relatively clustered together. The potential Western division is completely spread out beyond ridiculous proportions. I think if anything, Karl needs to be focusing on a travel partner for Idaho and New Mexico State. Who might you ask? Though I will admit the pickings are pretty slim, I do have a few ideas:

 PERKS:
-Located in Flagstaff, great tourist city
-Great support and stable program
-Great facility in the Walkup Dome (used for football, basketball and other sports)
Negatives:
-Only sponsors 5 events for men, though they do offer 8 for women.
-Seems pretty comfortable as a FCS member
-Could/Would they support adding the additional scholarships needed to become FBS level member?





PERKS:
-Geographic wise, It appears almost a halfway point between Idaho and New Mexico State which could help with traveling costs for the two schools.
-With nearly 100,000 people residing in Greeley (where UNC is located) again seems to be a great size city to have an SBC affiliated team.
-Made the NCAA basketball tournament in 2011 and have made 10 appearances in the College World Series.
-Though not a football member, the Sunbelt did have a full sport member located in Colorado for 13 years (Denver Pioneers anyone?).
Negatives:
-The Bears have only been at FCS level for about 8 years now, and appear not ready to jump immediately to FBS Level.
-Number of home games in 2012: 7. Total number of spectators for a UNC football game: 26,764. AVERAGE: 3,823. Not going to cut the Division I Attendance requirements.


PERKS:
-Huge enrollment with over 20,000 students attending.
Negatives:
-Not enough men's sports offered (6)
-Not really ideally located
-Lack of interest or support to warrant an invite


In all honesty, take a look at the conference member map: Even with NMSU way out west, they don't nearly stick out awkwardly as the Vandals do. Simply put, Karl threw them a bone they desperately and emphatically snatched in an instant. They don't belong (AS MUCH AS I DO LOVE THE KIBBIE DOME WHICH IS PICTURED BELOW):



The vandals need to accept reality that they aren't a division I player and go back to the Big Sky conference, where they once dominated. Though NMSU has struggled in the last several seasons, I believe they still have potential (though it's going to take A LOT of work) to get them to become a viable player in the conference. Let's assume we boot Idaho out; all we're concerned with now is finding the Aggies a travel buddy to help ease the distance with the rest of the members: once again using our handy dandy map graphic here are the most viable and probable potential candidates:


So between ASU and NMSU, their are six FCS schools in the state of texas with football programs (Keep in mind the Red dot signifies current Sunbelt mate, Texas State). Their are actually two additional programs, Praire View A&M and Texas Southern University, however both aren't capable nor viable options to move up Division I so they're out of the question. The following six schools are:

Brown-Abilene Christian University Wildcats (Abilene, Texas)
Green-Incarnate Word Cardinals (San Antonio, Texas)
Blue-Lamar University Cardinals (Beumont, Texas)
Gold-Houston Baptist Cougars (Houston, Texas)
Purple-Sam Houston State Bearkats (Huntsville, Texas)
Pink-Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (Nacogdoches, Texas)

Their are no other choices relatively close for the Aggies-if they want a conference mate they gotta have another Texas one with Texas State. Abilene Christian, Incarnate Word and Houston Baptist are ALL just starting their football program, so I'd say they're easily out. That leaves...

 Technically, Lamar has recently started their football back up after decades of being suspended, but they have recently completed an extensive renovation of their stadium as well as having established history with both Louisiana schools and Arkansas State (Lamar and Lafayette even once battled for the Sabine Trophy for several years). They've been 15-22 since their "rebirth" in 2011, and seemingly have solid support so far.













Both Stephen F. Austin and Sam Houston State both have been members of the Southland conference since 1987. SHSU Bearkats have been the primarily more successful program, having won one FCS national championship with five conference titles and several apperances in the FCS Playoffs. The lumberjacks of Stephen F. Austin success on the field have been less but still boast strong and passionate fanbase as do the Bearkats.


One GLARINGLY problem is the former Southland members: Arkansas State, UL-Monroe and UL-Lafayette. All three have made it abundantly clear they want nothing to do with the Southland Conference whatsoever which means instantly shooting down any possibility of any current member of the SLC to join the Sunbelt. I find this a little humorous, seeing how Texas State was a member of the Southland for over 25 years from 1987 to 2012 before moving up to the division I level, joining the WAC when they still sponsored football play. 


FINAL THOUGHTS:
     The future of the Sunbelt conference is murky to say the least. Though significant strides of improvement have been achieved the last 4-5 years, the future of the conference remains in doubt. Each member seemingly is ready at an instant notice to bolt for C-USA or even the MAC in some rumblings I've read. If theirs going to be football in the Sunbelt Conference's future, it's going to come down to this 12th member in my opinion. One thing to keep in mind here that many forget is this: Karl Benson doesn't have the FINAL say of the 12th member, the school's president's do. Benson can only make a recommendation, make his case and answer questions as to why he'd suggest said school. That's it. Ultimately, the current Universities leaders are the ones that will keep the boat afloat or sink it. If you can't tell by this incredibly extensive article, their doesn't seem to be at all any universal consensus as to what, or if any, of the said mentioned schools have a chance at getting an offer.

The one school that does want in, Liberty, has already been voted down once. It seems very apparent the current conference mates don't want a private, evangelical christian school as a member. Truthfully, I don't blame them-I respect their history and tradition but their universal agenda doesn't mesh well with current members, despite their impressive athletic budget and facilities.

James Madison, despite also having great facilities and fantastic enrollment numbers, doesn't appear to want to be involved with the 'Belt at this time-end of story.

Eastern Kentucky, Missouri State, Tennessee Chattanooga-established football programs, all three in states without sunbelt representation and located in ideal cities. All three however, either unsure or incapable of taking the necessary steps to become division I, at least before June 1st.

When it's all said and done, I think Missouri State would be the best selection. Their fans from all indication seems enthusiastic about a future in the Sunbelt and if Missouri can be in the SEC East, why not Missouri State in the Sunbelt Eastern division? Their could be a potential great border war for ASU and MSU much like what they're trying to do with Arkansas and Missouri and though I wouldn't oppose the idea of EKU in joining the conference, it appears the Bears are much more ahead both financially, fan support and athletically wise to make "the big move" than the Colonels. Finally, I think a case could and has been made for Lamar to join-though still young and so far off to a stumbling start back in playing football, their's much history with a three of the prominent league members already and their could a instate rivalry with Texas State. And the fact that the administration and the student body were able to vote to approve to bringing back the program to fielding a team in such a short amount of time (Four years!) is enough to convince me that a transition to FBS level could be easily sustainable if allowed to occur.

Until June 1st comes, we can only speculate and ponder as to who this mysterious 12th member could and very well may be.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Twistin' the Night Away....


The summer nights in the Natural State are long, often times dull and always hot. These days if you're looking for entertainment in the central Arkansas area, particularly of the sporting kind, your only option is to attend an Arkansas Travelers game; the Travs are a Double-A minor league baseball team that plays out of the Texas League and has done so since 1966. Their continued success can be much attributed to the grass roots that the sport baseball has had on American culture since the late 1800s and onward. The long standing success and support for the Travelers is nothing short of miraculous when you consider the sporting history of the state of Arkansas-or lack thereof. For decades, semi pro teams have and gone in Arkansas like a flash of light-often times with vast majority of the public not even noticing. Don't believe me? Here's just a FEW "noticeable" ones:

The Arkansas Diamonds (Continental Football League 1968-1969) Overall Record: 7-17

















The Arkansas GlacierCats (Western Professional Hockey League 1998-200) Overall Record: 69-56



 The Arkansas Rimrockers (American Basketball Association 2004-2005: ABA League Champions Record 28-5)
(NBA-Developmental League 2005-2007 Overall Record: 40-58)

The Arkansas Riverblades (East Coast Hockey League 1999-2003) Overall Record: 120-128)
Team Arkansas (All-American Football League)
Never played.












Quite honestly, their are countless of more teams. However the one particular franchise I'd like to examine in this blog is the Arkansas Twisters. Currently the second longest semi-professional team that operated in the state (Northwest Arkansas Naturals are still another four years behind before tying) the Twisters played ten seasons in North Little Rock. As founding members of the AF2 league, the Arkansas franchise first played in 2000 and continued fielding play all the way to 2009, when their big brother league the Arena Football League folded, and the AF2 became the current incarnation of the AFL. Though the Twisters had an opportunity to be apart of the league, the owners instead moved the team to the lesser known Indoor Football League, where they became the 'Arkansas Diamonds' and after one season of play, moved to their current location in Allen Texas. (Where they have since changed team names two more additional times). These highly questionable moves stunned Twisters fans: why not stay in the newly formed AFL? why change your team name? Perhaps more importantly, why leave? The team fielded impressive attendance averages their first couple of years and though they did wane eventually, still held solid averages. The Twisters maintained an overall winning percentage and the team was popular enough to have a booster club started as a full sign of local support. The questions can hopefully be answered by examining their history from the beginning:



It was announced in 1999 that arena football would be coming to Arkansas. The Arena Football League had decided to launch it's own "minor league" and announced the creation of the Arena Football League 2-or AF2 for short. The city of North Little Rock seemed like a very obvious location to award a franchise, mostly due to the then newly constructed Alltel Arena and the idea of most AF2 teams being located in "Mid-size cities." The team was owned by an organization called the Arkansas Sports Entertainment LLC, who's CEO was an individual by the name of Dave Berryman. A year before, his company had brought hockey to the North Little Rock area when he was awarded a franchise in the East Coast Hockey League (the Arkansas Riverblades). However, attendance quickly faded with the hockey organization, dropping from an average of 3, 976 in their inaugural season to just over 3,400 in the 2000-2001 season. Berryman had numerous experiences with semi-professional teams in the past, most notably operating  the surprisingly successful minor league hockey team, the Louisiana Icegators, in Lafayette, Louisiana. With his past experiences, as well as his seemingly deep commitment to bringing vast array of sports to central Arkansas, it was a bright moment for sporting fans.

                                                    2001-2002: High Hopes, Low Results:
The Twisters played their first game on April 8th, 2000 before a record crowd of 16,058. Arkansas dominated and cruised to their first victory, 86-13. Attendance numbers never dipped below 11,000 that season and despite ending the season with a losing record (7-9), they dominated the league's average attendance standings, averaging 13,766 fans. What they didn't dominate were teams; on top of having a losing record their inagural year, they fared even worse their second season, only going 6-10. Part of the problem was their lack of scoring, only averaging 49 points a game; while that seems quite a bit of points in the traditional football game, in the arena game the average winning scores range 60 plus, often times being even higher than 70 points. The lack of victories quickly related to the drop in attendance and by the end of the 2001 season, the average had dropped over 4,000 spectators, leaving the average at 9,351. Despite the slip in spectators, they still led the league in attendance.


                                     2002-2003: Post Season Action, Championship Play
The 2002 season finally gave way for the Twister's first winning season and post season play. Led by exciting play, which included Arkansas scoring the highest points in the history of the AF2 (102 points) the Twisters won nine out of their last ten games to secure their first ever post season bid in the playoffs. However, the team lost a heart-breaker on the road in the first round, losing in a surprisingly defensive slug fest to bitter rivals the Tulsas Talons, 34-32.

                                                        
The 2003 season started off sluggish, with the team sitting at 4-4 at the halfway point of the season. No one thought the Twisters had a remote shot of getting back to the playoffs, let alone the AF2 championship. However, Arkansas not only secured another playoff bid, but hosted their first playoff home game, defeating the Bakersfield Blitz 36-28. Though many were pleasantly surprised by the win, many more would be shocked when the Twisters headed to Moline, Illinois to upset the top seeded Quad City Steamwheelers, 63-61, handing Quad City their second defeat of the season. The miraculous run was short lived however, when once again Arkansas was ousted out of contention for the arenacup by their rivals, Tulsa, losing in the National Conference championship game, 63-52. The bitter defeat would sting even after the game as the Talons would go on to win their first arenacup championship that same season.


                                                          2004-2005: The Slump Era

Twisters and the Twister faithful were riding high on the improbable 2003 season, with the average attendance increasing from 7,189 in 2003 to almost 8,700 in 2004. Arkansas started the season with a victory  on April 3rd, before a crowd of 10,552, their highest attended game since July 12, 2002. However the victory would be short lived as Arkansas would go on to lose 10 straight games, not winning again until July 2, when they defeated the Bossier-Shreveport Battlewings, 67-61. They would win only two more games that season, ending the 2004 campaign at 4-12, their worst season in the team's history.

2005 was another clunker year, only winning one more game than the previous season, and the attendance dropping significantly from 8,691 to 6,751.

                                              2006-2009: Redemption Years and the Last


After two, terrible seasons of pitiful play, Arkansas came storming out of the gates, winning four of their first five and ultimately winning more than the past two season combined. With a strong, consistent performance by the offense the Twisters stormed their way through the playoffs, sweeping both Oklahoma teams, on the road, in back to back weeks and advanced all the way to the National Conference championship again, but once again came up short in the big moment, losing to the eventual ArenaCup champions the Spokane Shock, 48-30.



















Over the course of 2007-2009, the Twisters played fantastically throughout the regular season, compiling an overall record of 34-14, and hosting a first round home playoff game two out of the three years, with 2009 being the only time they had to play on the road. However, Arkansas lost all three games. A startling trend that began during this era was the steadily decline in attendance, despite the success the Twisters were having on the field. Starting in 2007, the average attendance was 5,238: in 2008 it dropped to 5,218: finally in 2009, it dramatically plummeted to just 3,703. We'll examine the possibilities for these figures later on in the blog.

In April 2009, the Arena Football League suspended the 2009 season in order to "create long-term plan to improve its economic model" (as quoted from their offical press release). Ultimately the league filed for both Chapter 11 & 7 bankruptcy and in essence, the league was dead. However, the AF2 was virtually it's own league and was shockingly stable; it was quickly announced that the AF2 acquire the entity and all the property rights of the former arena football league and at first would become the "Arena Football League 1."



With the addition of the remaining AF2 teams (Arkansas being one of them), many former AFL teams would join this new entity, ranging from Dallas, Orlando, Chicago, San Jose, and much more. The recently named new owners of the Twisters, Jim Smith and Jeff Everett were initially excited for the recent developments. Yet, both soon grew concerned with league's original idea of having a "higher tier teams(the former AFL teams located in the bigger market cities) playing only against each other while the "lower tier teams" (Arkansas, Tulsa, Oklahoma City) would play one another. On top of that, the lower tier teams would essentially be like "farm teams" where the higher tier teams could pluck players from them at any time throughout the season. The dislike of this format was understandable; however without any sudden warning abruptly withdrew from the AF1 and joined the upstart Indoor Football League. The Arena 1 league informed both owners they could no longer be known as the 'Twisters' as this was still owned by the AF1.

With that the Twisters were dead and thus became....


However, before the newly named Diamonds even took the field, they updated the logo to this:


Despite the promise of the owners that their would still be "excitement" and "fireworks" on and off the field, nothing about the team remained. Former players that had become stables on the roster for several years, including Johnathan Schoonover, Kevin Williams, Robert Kilow, Robert Johnson, David Carlton and many more quickly abandoned the team.


The Sirens were gone....




Radar, the beloved Twister's mascot became a miner with a sprayed on mustache...

The Diamonds took the field in spring of 2010, and despite all the change proved very formidable, ending up with a 12-4 overall record, losing in the semi finals of the IFL playoffs. However, the support was non existant. Though exact numbers have never really surfaced in terms of an average attendance, I did find this picture to show how virtually no one cared for the Diamonds:


In September 2010, Jim Smith and Jeff Everett announced they were moving the team to Allen, Texas where they became the Allen Wranglers.

The Arkansas Twisters were officially dead and gone.

One point I'd like to share: the "AF1" after some legal wrangling renamed itself the arena football league. The originally planned "upper division, lower division" scheme was scrapped and all teams played at the same level. Teams that the Twisters used to play often in the AF2, Tulsa and Oklahoma City, went on to play in the newly formed Arena Football League. The OKC Yard-dawgz eventually folded, while the Talons moved to San Antonio. The

League is still playing to this day, and recently announced a new TV deal with ESPN to begin airing games this spring.


                                           LASTING LEGACY AND FINAL THOUGHTS

For some, the Arkansas Twisters were merely an afterthought; others were die hard, fanatic fans. For ten years the Twisters offered fast paced, high scoring show; in their existence they played in a league that saw over 20 teams come and go and yet, they withstood. Overall, they had a 53% winning average and more importantly, saw over 600,000 total spectators watch them play, with a lifetime average attendance of 7,344. I bet many of you didn't even realize that they were actually a playable team in the PS2 "Arena Football: Road To Glory" video game?!



Can Arkansas ever support a professional team? Highly doubtful.

However, I think the Arkansas Twisters showed that with the right, SMART ownership, that a semi-pro league other than baseball can be sustainable and rather successful in the Little Rock metro area. They were proven winners: they offered a winning program for a public that for the majority of its existence, showed up to watch. With less games, a shorter season and less history than the Travs, the Twisters still outdrew the Travelers. The Twisters were pretty much gutted and mutilated because of jumpy leadership; they moved to a sub-par indoor league and tried to push an unfamiliar product to a public that simply refused to accept them. Even the short lived Rimrockers were at one time wildly popular and successful; they're still to date the only other semi-professional team to have won a league championship (excluding the Travs and Naturals of course). Again, poor ownership decisions moved them to the NBA-DL, where the talent was far more superior to the Rimrockers and after two horrifc seasons, moved to La Crosse, Wisconsin.

I sincerely hope North Little Rock/Little Rock gets any legitimate semi-pro team. Hell quite honestly I'd really enjoy seeing another arena football team back in Verizon someday. There's a hungry fan base waiting to watch balls bounce off rebound nets and to sing "Twist and Shout" with every touchdown.